Foot-in-mouth disease

Motion to Quash The Court's Order on Defendant's Application For Subpoena Duces Tecum For the documents in the Possession of Texas Equusearch Based on Bad Faith

On June 22, I wrote this:

304 days ago, Todd Macaluso stood before the Ninth Circuit Court of Florida, in front of Judge Stan Strickland, and made this blanket statement:

“There is substantial evidence that we’ve found … that the body or remains of Caylee Anthony were placed there after Casey Anthony was locked up. It proves that somebody else placed the remains in the area.”

For ten months, we were led to believe this would be the tack the defense would take at trial, based on statements made by TES searchers, off-record, who said the land where Caylee was found three months later was not flooded in September when they searched. What made this so senseless was the undisputed fact regarding summer weather in Central Florida. Roy Kronk said under oath that the woods were too flooded to enter in mid-August of 2008. Soon after he reported his sighting, T.S. Fay rolled into town, adding over 12" of rain to an already flooded and low-lying location. Come September, no one could go in there to search, and TES leader Tim Miller instructed his teams to keep away from areas under water; that it may destroy evidence.

I believe Cheney Mason was smart enough to recognize that, because yesterday, he did an abrupt about-face. Huh? What's this all about? In a post-hearing press conference, Mason said:

"They did not search the exact areas where the body was found. So everything they said before that is not relevant."

Did Brother Cheney speak out of school? Is he spanking the numero uno defense attorney, Jose Baez, by taking the lead, or is it part of an orchestrated effort because of one simple truth - the area was too flooded to search and the State has the proof to back it up? I think the answer is yes. The area WAS flooded and the statement of Macaluso past must be erased from the memory bank of future defense maneuvers. Of course, we won't discuss plant and insect forensic evidence at the moment. That comes later.

On July 16 of 2009, Jose Baez and Andrea D. Lyon filed two motions. One was to certify Tim Miller as a material witness and/or to subpoena him for documents in the possession of TES. The motion makes several claims:

1. "This area [8750 block of Suburban Drive] was searched by several individuals, including Orange County law enforcement and TES volunteers, between July and December 2008."
2. "Several searchers have made statements to Orange County law enforcement and to the media stating either that they searched the 8750 block of Suburban Drive with TES, or they encountered TES searchers in that area."
3. "... that Orange County law enforcement provided TES with documents identifying the area in question as an area of interest; that witnesses have made various statements (including in a sworn interview) to the effect that they searched the area in question on behalf of TES or saw TES searchers in that area..."

In another defense motion filed November 23 of 2009, the defense had this to say:

"The Defense, through its own independent investigation, has interviewed several TES searchers who not only searched the area where the remains were found, but who were not among the thirty-two (32) identified by TES."

This was the now famous motion containing the statements of Joseph Jordanand Laura Buchanan, in which the bold claim was made that:

"The signed statements from Joe Jordan and Laura Buchanan, included with this Memorandum of Law, indicate that there were several people who searched the Suburban Drive neighborhood but were not among the thirty-two (32) names disclosed by TES.

Why did the defense decide to run diametrically opposed to previous statements and motions? Clearly, this is something Cheney Mason conjured up because Jose Baez and Andrea Lyon filed motions that are contrary to this new revelation. They are also motions this defense did not win, and there lies the crux. Since this didn't work, let's try something else. Gone with the old, in with the new, and most certainly, Mason is not naive to the ins and outs of criminal defense strategies. Here's the brand new slant:

“What do you have that shows she was not there in June?” WFTV reporter Kathi Belich asked him.

“That's when Caylee was missing. We don't know when she disappeared,” he replied.

AHA! The linguistic switch! No one knows when Caylee disappeared. As President Clinton once responded, "It all depends on what your definition of isis," there are discrepancies in the meanings of missing and disappearing. I guess we could establish the fact that my keys may be missing if I lost them, but they certainly didn't disappear because they would have to be where I left them, unless, of course, they were taken by someone else. Then, they would have disappeared and they are missing. Got that? You see, it's all in the semantics. Instead of admitting it can't win the flooding argument, the defense concedes by manipulating the verbiage. What it will attempt to prove in court is that Casey lost Caylee, but she didn't disappear. It was precisely like losing a set of keys, only she wasn't where Casey last left her. Let's see... was that at Sawgrass, or was it at Jay Blanchard Park? Oh. She lost her at Sawgrass, but she disappeared from Blanchard. Today, Casey misses her more than anything else. Gotcha!

Last night, the Orlando Sentinel reported that Mark NeJame, the attorney representing Texas EquuSearch, argued that the defense team had "earlier opportunities to review Texas EquuSearch records, as directed under court orders, but failed to follow through."

"The defense is clearly operating under bad faith and looking to harass the volunteers," he stated in a motion filed yesterday to invalidate an earlier court order regarding the issue. In this new motion, NeJame noted that Mason stated publicly last month that the area where Caylee's remains were found "was impassible at the time." This is precisely my argument today as it was a month ago.

Let me reiterate what Mason declared last month: "They did not search the exact areas where the body was found. So everything they said before that is not relevant." The 'they' in this case is Texas EquuSearch and its teams of volunteer searchers.

Because of Mason's statement, NeJame threw it back in the defense's face, "It is patently obvious and apparent that the defense knows the conditions of the area, and that they are no longer in need of the names of any searchers to verify this information."

According to the Sentinel report, NeJame further suggested "the defense 'is filing these motions, requesting irrelevant documents all to create seemingly bogus appellate issues that do not exist.' He calls the pursuit of the records 'a ploy to harass volunteers of TES who donated their free time to search for the remains of the innocent Caylee Anthony.'"

I couldn't agree with Mark NeJame more. Not to dismiss or make a mockery of Casey's defense team's request, but if TES searchers never stepped into the flooded woods, which Mason acknowledged no one did, what's the point of interviewing any more searchers? Why seek out anyone who wasn't there to begin with?

Cheney Mason defended astronaut Lisa Nowak. If I told him that John Glenn never set foot on the moon, would he want to interview him anyway? Would he expect Glenn to have knowledge of what gravity feels like on the lunar surface? Would he have learned something incriminating from his fellow astronauts - that the moon is made of Swiss cheese? If none of that made any sense, that's precisely my point.

Anticipating such a bad faith motion as the one filed by NeJame yesterday, Judge Perry announced in court last Thursday, and wrote in his order, that a new hearing would have to be set to present arguments from both sides. I didn't think a visit to NeJame's office by Casey's defense would be an easy stroll in the park. I get the distinct impression that he and Mason have never been colleagues or friends. No love will be lost as this spills out and into the awaiting hands of a thirsty public. Meanwhile, did someone stick their foot in their mouth or was last month's statement meant to be taken tongue-in-cheek? Either way, this one is full of holes.

Speaking of holes, on a final note, records from the Orange County Corrections Department show Casey's jail account is $41.51 in the hole as of yesterday. George stopped adding funds after she insinuated that he may have sexually molested her. I don't blame him one tiny bit.

“I still think Caylee’s alive."

I decided to leave the house early yesterday because this hearing was going to be a real doozie. We had Mark NeJame representing Texas EquuSearch, and testimony from Cindy and Lee. As Bob Kealing from WESH reported days earlier, it was the first time in over a year that the Anthony family would be in the same place at the same time. George was there to lend his support.

When I arrived at the courthouse, around 1:00 PM, I ran into Bob. We discussed the case and rode up the elevator together, along with his camera operator and several other people. Also accompanying Bob was an intern from UNCW. He finishes his internship soon, so it was good that he got to go to a very important hearing. I pretty much hung around with that crowd and had a good chat with other reporters and Red Huber, the award winning photographer with theOrlando Sentinel. I also had a very good conversation with a certain court administrator who set my mind at ease over false allegations made against me. I'll leave it at that, but needless to say, no one was able to frighten me into staying away from the courthouse, and no one was on the lookout for a fictitious "gun-toting impersonator of the law" with a beautiful bald head.

It was around 1:30 when a deputy opened the courtroom doors and and called out to all media people. I was invited in with the others. Soon, Jose Baez and Cheney Mason entered and began to settle into their stations. Jose nodded and greeted some of the reporters and then waved to me, saying, "Hello, Dave."

Of course, I returned the gesture.

Moments later, Cindy and George entered with Brad Conway. I was in the second row and Cindy called me by name and asked if I would mind moving back a row. Of course, I didn't mind. No matter what, testifying in court is never a fun thing and I certainly wanted her to be as comfortable as possible.

After about 5 minutes, the door was opened to the public and everyone filed in. I had arrived early because of the crowd I anticipated. The courtroom and gallery soon filled up with spectators, and many went up the stairs to the balcony. I chose to sit behind the defense because I was with a media friend who sat there, and also for another very good reason. I wanted to be up close and personal to the most important people there, aside from Casey and all of the attorneys, meaning prosecution and defense. Besides, I see nothing wrong with sitting wherever I choose, whether anyone likes it or not, and in order to get the feel and mood of people, what better way than being near? I have never been one to believe that the side one sits on in a courtroom is the stand one takes, and as a writer, I need to approach a story from all angles, not just one.

I wondered where Lee was and, presto, just like that, there he was. He shuffled into the row with his girlfriend, Mallory, in the lead. After they both hugged George and Cindy he took a seat next to his mother, with Mallory to his right, directly in front of me. No matter what people may think, I found her to be a fresh-face in the courtroom. By that, I mean she had a clean and wholesome All-American look.

At 1:53, Casey entered the room. Seven minutes later, like clockwork, Chief Judge Belvin Perry walked in and took his seat behind the bench. The first issue of the day dealt with the reconsideration of a prior ruling made by Judge Strickland pertaining to Texas EquuSearch records. Judge Perry announced that both sides would have 5 minutes to address the issue. Within seconds, Baez asked for and was granted a sidebar with the judge, NeJame, Mason and Linda Drane Burdick. Jeff Ashton was not present at this time. 12 minutes later, the sidebar broke up, the attorneys walked back to their respective stations and the judge announced that Mr. Baez had withdrawn the TES motion. He said that the defense could inspect the documents again, they could take notes, and a special magistrate, Jim Glatt, would oversee the task. There would be no deadline, but he expected it to be done by some time next week, and a hearing would be set thereafter. With that, NeJame was excused and the court moved to the next motion, the 911 calls made by Cindy precisely two years earlier.

On May 10 of this year, the court asked for a response to an order regarding the theory of admissibility of those 911 calls. Yesterday, Linda Drane Burdick opened the issue by saying it should be treated like a motion in limine or else go to trial and file an objection of admissibility at that time, which would delay the trial. To give you an idea of the complexity, we must first understand this motion in limine. It's a motion used by attorneys in civil or criminal cases to preclude prejudicial or objectionable evidence before it is seen or heard by a jury. The primary advantage of the in limine motion is to avoid the futile attempt of trying to undo harm done where jurors have been exposed to damaging evidence, even where later stricken by the court.¹

There were three people set to testify, Cindy, Lee and Debbie Polisano, who was Cindy's supervisor at Gentiva, where she was a nurse. Lee had come with his erstwhile attorney, Tom Luka. Cindy was called to the stand first. Debbie Polisano was no where in sight. While sitting close to Cindy, I could plainly see she was very nervous. As she walked toward the witness box, Lee was asked to leave the courtroom and not discuss the case with anyone. This is a standard procedure and it eliminates the possibility of contriving the same or similar testimony given by the first witness.

Jose Baez asked the first questions. Mostly, the conversation centered on what transpired the day that led to the calls, from learning of the car at the tow yard to calling Casey with no response to finally finding her to frantically calling police. It was a nerve wracking day. She said that she took her lunch hour to pick the car up with George after he called to let her know. They met at the house. She took $500 with her. George never told her about the smell until they returned with Casey's car. He said he had to drive with the windows down because it was like something had died - like a dead body, in the car. George needed to go to work and Cindy took a few things out of the car to air out in the yard. She threw a pair of Casey's slacks in the washer and returned to work. She said that she didn't say anything to anyone at work about the smell of death, but did discuss the problem with her supervisor, Debbie Polisano, who was still nowhere to be found.

When she returned home around 6:00 PM, she took the slacks out of the washer and placed them in the dryer. She then went back to the car and again noticed the smell while removing dolls belonging to Caylee, and a bag. She put them in the back yard, too. This is when she found copies of Amy Huizenga's resumé. After calling Casey with no reply, she called Amy, who was at the Florida Mall. Meanwhile, George phoned Lee and asked him to go home to help his mother, as she attempted to locate his sister. Without going into all of the details, which we practically know by heart now, let's just go straight to the 911 calls. The first one came at 8:09 PM as Cindy pulled into Orlando PD's Southeast Community Police Office (SECPO) on Pershing Avenue. Unknown to her was that the office closed at 5:00 PM and it was now over three hours later. She told the dispatcher that Casey had stolen money and the car, but the car had been found. Casey sat next to her mother. Since it was not an emergency, she drove home and was instructed to call OCSO because it was out of Orlando's jurisdiction. This is because the Hopespring neighborhood off Chickasaw Trail is in an unincorporated area of the city and falls under county control.

Lee was waiting inside the house. The three of them conversed and during that time, Lee told his mother that he had smelled the car as he walked in the garage. The second 911 call was made around 8:44 PM, and Cindy testified that the dispatcher was lackadaisical about her claims and found it to be a non-urgent event. At this time, she was not aware that Caylee was missing. Meanwhile, Lee began talking to his sister about the situation. This is the conversation Cindy overheard that brought about the third 911 call at 9:41 PM. Casey hadn't seen her daughter in 31 days, she was abducted by a nanny named Zanny and Cindy was panicking fast.  Lee later testified that his mother pounded Casey's bed and screamed, "What have you done???!!!"

During this 911 call, Cindy testified yesterday that she did it out of desperation in order to force the police to arrive at the house faster. She said she had never smelled a decomposing body in a car before. Rotting and burned flesh, yes, but not from anyone expiring in a hospital or in the morgue, where bodies are refrigerated. She said she never put two and two together. She never felt that Caylee was the cause of the smell in the car.

When Linda Drane Burdick cross examined, she cited pages and sections from prior interviews; what she said during depositions with Corporals Eric Edwards and Yuri Melich, and FBI Special Agent Scott Bowen. Some of it didn't seem to line up with what she had just said. Suddenly, there were more instances of "I don't remember" than during the defense's more friendly engagement with her. She reiterated that she didn't connect Caylee with the smell. Burdick handed Cindy copies of the 911 transcripts in an attempt to refresh her memory and force her hand. (Jeff Ashton arrives at 3:13) Cindy knew that Casey had told Lee that they had to wait until the next day to pick up Caylee and this is when the 31 days came into the conversation that shocked Cindy. Burdick maintained that none of the three 911 calls were premeditated, particularly the last one, and that's what made it an excited utterance as opposed to hearsay. To make this clear, an excited utterance is a statement relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition. (See: Hearsay Exemptions if Witness is Able to Testify)

We took a 10 minute break at this time. While out in the hall talking to someone, Jose Baez passed by me on his way to the men's room. He patted me on my shoulder and I asked him one quick question. "Are you a baseball fan?"

"I LOVE IT!" he exclaimed, and continued on. It was just something I knew in my gut, it wasn't really important, but it does show he's got a life outside of this case.

When court resumed, Jose came back to rebut. Cindy made it clear that she wanted police to continue looking for a live Caylee, and that she made statements to law enforcement to force them to continue searching for her granddaughter. It was at this time she said, "I still think Caylee's alive."

A minute later, she was excused and Debbie Polisano was called. She was still not at the courthouse. The judge reminded the defense she was subpoenaed to testify and the subpoena stated 2:00 PM. Instead of getting angry, the judge shifted to Lee, who was outside awaiting his call. It was now 3:48 PM.

Here is where I will end it for the day. There's plenty more, but over the weekend, I want to explain more of the dynamics in the courtroom - family, attorney interactions and some of the people sitting in the gallery. I will also go more into why the 911 calls were allowed. There is something else. I have been saying all along that I felt Cindy was (and remains to this day) in denial. This is something that has been so difficult to absorb, I don't think any of us know how we would react if handed the same set of circumstances. Would any of us come out unscathed? I'm not making any excuses, but sitting where I did, I could see clearer than a TV screen, HD or not.

EquuSearch: Running out of patience before us?

As soon as members of the media showed up at Mark NeJame’s office this past Friday, Casey Anthony’s defense team ran out the door, tails between their legs. They had arrived only minutes earlier to look over records belonging to Texas EquuSearch.

Now, TES officials say they want to try to break the standoff with Casey’s team in court. One source said that, with Chief Judge Belvin Perry now in charge, they want him to decide when enough is enough. They are fed up with playing the waiting game. For more than eight months TES has waged a large legal battle over keeping most of the searchers’ records private.

In August of 2009, Casey’s defense team won the right to pore over records of 32 searchers who looked closest to the location where Caylee’s remains were eventually found. The defense later filed a motion to copy all of the records of roughly 4,000 people who looked for the toddler at all other locations, including south of OIA. Judge Stan Strickland denied that motion.

The defense made claims that at least two of the searchers looked in the very spot where Caylee rested and found nothing. Texas EquuSearch is getting fed up with the defense and is planning on filing legal paperwork to have the new judge order Mason & Co. to review the records and be done with it. Mark NeJame declined to comment.

In one other bit of news, and if my source is correct, Baez will stand behind the shadow of Cheney Mason because Mason has tried a number of cases before Judge Perry. Mason is also known to be a one man band with lots of attorneys he can turn to for assistance. He has surrounded himself with an excellent blend of specialists, all independent and all within the immediate vicinity of his office. In other words, he rents them space.