Whatever it is, it's good enough to keep under wraps for now
We will not know what Judge Strickland looked at, because what he saw was good enough to keep it from Casey’s defense for the next 30 days, according to the good judge’s decision today. That means it will most likely be more than a month before it hits discovery, if everything unfolds as ordered.
Here is exactly what the judge decided today. Remember, this could still be a means to keep it out of the media’s hands, too.
§
Order on State of Florida’s In Camera Sealed Motion to Delay Disclosure
THIS COURT, upon consideration of the State of Florida’s In camera Sealed Motion to Delay Disclosure hereby rules as, follows.
- The State has shown good cause for a delay in disclosure pursuant to F.R.C.P. 3.220(K).
- The State is hereby authorized to delay disclosure of the material referenced in their motion for a period of thirty days or such earlier time, should the good cause referred to in their motion no longer exist.
- Unless earlier disclosed, the State, no more than thirty days from the date of this order, shall report to the court, by sealed pleading, whether any good cause continues to exist additional delay in disclosure.
- At such time as the good cause no longer exists and the materials are provided in discovery, the State shall so inform the court and the Motion shall be unsealed and provided to the Defendant
SO ORDERED this 24th day of February 2010.
Stan Strickland
Circuit Judge
§
In my article posted on February 5, Let’s shoot for the in camera ex parte motion, I explained the meaning of two suffixes attached to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, the “M” and the “K”. The “M” pertained to proceedings. The “K” is specific about the court changing times:
(k) Court May Alter Times. The court may alter the times for compliance with any discovery under these rules on good cause shown.
This is precisely what Judge Strickland decided to do. He chose to read the materials and information behind closed doors and keep it there for 30 days, if not shorter or longer, depending on the circumstances that arise henceforth. Whatever it is, we will not know until it is released due to discovery. Until then, we can guess all we want, but please remember that Dominic Casey’s D&A Investigations, Inc. Web site still says this:
Caylee Marie Anthony disappeared sometime after June 16, 2008. D&A have been Investigating the circumstances surrounding Caylee Marie’sdisappearance since July of 2008 at the request of the Family. If you have any information about Caylee Marie’s disappearance or death …
Now, you can discuss it until the cows come home to roost, but I’m not going to venture much of an opinion on it because I JUST DON”T KNOW, and as I said on my previous post on Feb. 5, this “could be something big or it may be nothing at all that merits our total abandonment of all other evidence, a la the triumphant answer to all of our questions, the one that will cause Creme de la Poison to surge through Casey’s veins.”
READ JUDGE STRICKLAND’S RULING
We will not know what Judge Strickland looked at, because what he saw was good enough to keep it from Casey’s defense for the next 30 days, according to the good judge’s decision today. That means it will most likely be more than a month before it hits discovery, if everything unfolds as ordered.
Here is exactly what the judge decided today. Remember, this could still be a means to keep it out of the media’s hands, too.
§
Order on State of Florida’s In Camera Sealed Motion to Delay Disclosure
THIS COURT, upon consideration of the State of Florida’s In camera Sealed Motion to Delay Disclosure hereby rules as, follows.
- The State has shown good cause for a delay in disclosure pursuant to F.R.C.P. 3.220(K).
- The State is hereby authorized to delay disclosure of the material referenced in their motion for a period of thirty days or such earlier time, should the good cause referred to in their motion no longer exist.
- Unless earlier disclosed, the State, no more than thirty days from the date of this order, shall report to the court, by sealed pleading, whether any good cause continues to exist additional delay in disclosure.
- At such time as the good cause no longer exists and the materials are provided in discovery, the State shall so inform the court and the Motion shall be unsealed and provided to the Defendant
SO ORDERED this 24th day of February 2010.
Stan Strickland
Circuit Judge
§
In my article posted on February 5, Let’s shoot for the in camera ex parte motion, I explained the meaning of two suffixes attached to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, the “M” and the “K”. The “M” pertained to proceedings. The “K” is specific about the court changing times:
(k) Court May Alter Times. The court may alter the times for compliance with any discovery under these rules on good cause shown.
This is precisely what Judge Strickland decided to do. He chose to read the materials and information behind closed doors and keep it there for 30 days, if not shorter or longer, depending on the circumstances that arise henceforth. Whatever it is, we will not know until it is released due to discovery. Until then, we can guess all we want, but please remember that Dominic Casey’s D&A Investigations, Inc. Web site still says this:
Caylee Marie Anthony disappeared sometime after June 16, 2008. D&A have been Investigating the circumstances surrounding Caylee Marie’sdisappearance since July of 2008 at the request of the Family. If you have any information about Caylee Marie’s disappearance or death …
Now, you can discuss it until the cows come home to roost, but I’m not going to venture much of an opinion on it because I JUST DON”T KNOW, and as I said on my previous post on Feb. 5, this “could be something big or it may be nothing at all that merits our total abandonment of all other evidence, a la the triumphant answer to all of our questions, the one that will cause Creme de la Poison to surge through Casey’s veins.”
READ JUDGE STRICKLAND’S RULING
- The State has shown good cause for a delay in disclosure pursuant to F.R.C.P. 3.220(K).
- The State is hereby authorized to delay disclosure of the material referenced in their motion for a period of thirty days or such earlier time, should the good cause referred to in their motion no longer exist.
- Unless earlier disclosed, the State, no more than thirty days from the date of this order, shall report to the court, by sealed pleading, whether any good cause continues to exist additional delay in disclosure.
- At such time as the good cause no longer exists and the materials are provided in discovery, the State shall so inform the court and the Motion shall be unsealed and provided to the Defendant
SO ORDERED this 24th day of February 2010.
Stan Strickland
Circuit Judge
§
In my article posted on February 5, Let’s shoot for the in camera ex parte motion, I explained the meaning of two suffixes attached to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, the “M” and the “K”. The “M” pertained to proceedings. The “K” is specific about the court changing times:
(k) Court May Alter Times. The court may alter the times for compliance with any discovery under these rules on good cause shown.
This is precisely what Judge Strickland decided to do. He chose to read the materials and information behind closed doors and keep it there for 30 days, if not shorter or longer, depending on the circumstances that arise henceforth. Whatever it is, we will not know until it is released due to discovery. Until then, we can guess all we want, but please remember that Dominic Casey’s D&A Investigations, Inc. Web site still says this:
Caylee Marie Anthony disappeared sometime after June 16, 2008. D&A have been Investigating the circumstances surrounding Caylee Marie’sdisappearance since July of 2008 at the request of the Family. If you have any information about Caylee Marie’s disappearance or death …
Now, you can discuss it until the cows come home to roost, but I’m not going to venture much of an opinion on it because I JUST DON”T KNOW, and as I said on my previous post on Feb. 5, this “could be something big or it may be nothing at all that merits our total abandonment of all other evidence, a la the triumphant answer to all of our questions, the one that will cause Creme de la Poison to surge through Casey’s veins.”
Reader Comments