Tuesday
Nov022010
New Documents Released Today
Tuesday, November 2, 2010 at 11:40AM “Oh no!”
- Casey Anthony’s reaction to the news that the body of a small child was found in the woods off Suburban Drive (as told by Corrections Officer Tammi Unser)
New documents are being released today in the case against Casey Anthony. Among the documents are letters mailed to the jail, hand written notes from law enforcement, Casey’s reaction to learning a child’s body was found in the woods off Suburban Drive, and an application and authorization for installing a pen register.
244 PG DOC
246 PG DOC
418 PG DOC
CASEY’S REACTION TO BODY FOUND
CINDY’S LETTERS
LETTERS
NOTES
Please see: How the FBI handles Internet terrorist threats
LEGAL NOTICE
©David B. Knechel. All Rights Reserved. No portion of this site can be reproduced in it's entirety or in part without expressed written permission by the owner/administrator of this site in accordance with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Section 512(c)(3) of the U.S. Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §512(c)(3). The charges against defendants are mere accusations and the subjects are presumed innocent until found guilty in a court of law.
Reader Comments (60)
Thanks for the response but i dont think "people" are necessarily closed minded cause i had the same views. We acheive our perception off of what is released and all the things released painted a very poor picture of the family dynamics. I do look forward to your future post on Cindy but i think (and i havent yet been able to reveiw the comments) a lot of people will change theri views of Cindy and perhaps George. We are not Saints and everyone has a skeleton or two in their closet (i think mine looks more like a cemetary-not quite Arlington but close ha-ha) and what ever has happened in the marriage is not really my concern but i like to see the cohesiveness of the unit once their is trouble abrewin' and they really do have each others back. But this is just after reading the majority and i am stil reading.
Hi, Karen - I think the letters to Casey and Shirley's e-mails show a different side of Cindy, one that I've attempted to portray for some time now - that she's not quite there, and I don't mean that in a bad way. This murder has taken its toll on a woman who had (and still has) other issues. She admits to Caylee's demise as much as she denies it. That whole month between the middle of June and July must have been pure hell for her. Where does all this leave George? I don't know, but he's still around.
B-Man, I agree that there are some things that should have been left out, but hopefully, this will let us see more of the family dynamic and, perhaps, we will see things from a different perspective.
Cindy's letters to Casey are her self-serving attempt to taint the jury pool. I wonder if Casey even bothers reading them. I find it very disturbing that an element in our society would choose to befriend someone incarcerated and accused of murder. This has not been an easy case for the investigators---you would expect honesty from the mother, grandmother, grandfather, and uncle of a missing 2 year old---but wait---she wasn't really missing---she was hidden---or should I say her remains were hidden---how many Anthony's actually knew that from the start? Who did the lies benefit? Who did the concealment of a body benefit? Who truly cared for this child---then---and now?
Hi, pipkin52 - It's great to see you again. I would say flat out that none of the Anthonys, other than Casey, knew about what happened to Casey until it unfolded in mid-July, 2008. Cindy's desperation proves that, but more importantly is what law enforcement believes. The public can think whatever they want about the facts, but I follow the facts according to law enforcement, and not once has anyone insinuated that George, Cindy or Lee knew anything from the start. Later on? Probably, but remember, it will be their testimony at the trial that will more than likely seal Casey's fate. They can't lie because in the prosecutors' hands will be transcripts from very early on, before they had a chance to change their stories. This will prove they had nothing to do with the murder and, hence, knew nothing from the start.
As for the other letter writers, there are a lot of nutcases out there. Heck, they're all over the Internet, for that matter, making up stuff about people and writing letters to court clerks. They're even nuttier.
Seriously, it is very nice to see you. Thank you.
Hi Dave,
I love your new banner "over the river and through the woods." It is beautiful and very cheering. Heaven knows we need all of the cheering we can get these days. I like reading your posts because you are very fair. I feel a bit sorry for the whole Anthony family and Caylee in particular. Who knows where any of us would be if we had to walk a mile in their shoes? I think you are a gifted writer and, when you describe what you see in court, you give us the human element that is not apparent on the TV screen.
Amber
I imagine Cindy lurched around like a drunken sailor trying to control a situation way out of her abilities to control (gifted though she may have been in that department!), so sometimes leaning this way or that way, depending on what "new" info she had to deal with. Problem is, getting it all synched later into a narrative of sorts, not possible to do. Lee had it just right - "that was the story"- The Story.
WOW, that was a lot to read Dave:~)!!
if you dont mind i just had a couple observations that i thought were worth mentioning one being that the phantom nannies "relatives" were simply friends of KC's with their last names switched...funny.
Secondly, as i think you touch upon earlier, is that the affadavit by Curtis Jackson. Now i know there a wack jobs out there but could there be some validity to what he is saying. He goes into great detail of what happended and how things unfolded. I would be interested in establishing his relationship with one of KC friends. Its hard to put any faith into statements like his especially with O'Towns finest out there:~) but his seemed pretty credible and its the first time i ever heard of him.
Thirdly, again this is the first time i have read about these people but do you know if anyone's established any kind of relationship with Juan Gonzalez or Amanda Macklin (pg.123 of the 246 document)?
Thanks, Amber. It does look better than the woods off Suburban Drive. I am planning on changing out the banner with whatever hits me at the time. For instance, if I visit a place, I may put it up on the banner.
I do try to be fair to everyone, although I will readily admit I'm not always as evenhanded as I could be, but I do enjoy writing about the case from my perspective and I am very happy you enjoy it. Thank you for that, and I hope to see you again sometime soon!
There's a lot of stuff to read this time, B-Man. Most of it is superfluous, but some of it is rather interesting. As a matter of fact, I'm going to put up a new post in a few minutes. A new and old post.
I'm looking into that Curtis Jackson piece. I don't know what all I'll dig up.
As for the Juan Gonzalez/Amanda Macklin connection, no, I haven't had a chance to look into it yet.